Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering • University of California Irvine
CEE 225A Transportation Planning Models I

Spring 2021 [Course Code: 15940]
Instructor: Professor MG McNally <mmcnally@uci.edu>
Overview Schedule Notes Projects Links Home
Land Use / Transportation References
  1. Alonso,W (1964). Location and Land Use. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  2. Anas,A (1983a). Discrete choice theory, information theory and the multinomial logit and gravity models. Transportation Research, 17B, 13-23.
  3. Anas,A (1987). Modeling in Urban and Regional Development. Harwood, Chur, Switzerland.
  4. Anas,A (1984). Discrete choice theory and the general equilibrium of employment, housing, and travel networks in a Lowry-type model of the urban economy. Environment and Planning, 16A, 1489-1502.
  5. Barrett,C (1994). TRANSIMS: a bottoms-up approach to travel forecasting. Presented at the 73rd Transportation Research Board Annual Meetings. Washington, D.C.
  6. Batty,M (1976). Urban Modelling: Algorithms, Calibrations, Predictions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
  7. Batty,M (1980). Paradoxes of science in public policy: the baffling case of land use models. Sistemi Urbani, 1, 89-122.
  8. Batty,M and Hutchinson,B (Eds.) (1983). Systems Analysis in Urban Policy-Making and Planning, Plenum Press, New York.
  9. Berechman,J and Gordon,P (1986). Linked models of land use-transport interactions. In Hutchinson,B and Batty,M (Eds.) Advances in Urban Systems Modelling, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
  10. Berechman,J and Small,KA (1988). Research policy and review 25. Modeling land use and transportation: an interpretive review for growth areas. Environment and Planning, 20A, 1285-1309.
  11. Boyce,DE, Chon,KS, Lee,YJ, Lin,KT, and LeBlanc,LJ (1983). Implementation and computational issues for combined models of location, destination, mode, and route choice. Environment and Planning, 15A, 1219-1230.
  12. Brotchie,JF, Lesse,PF, and Roy,JR (1979). Entropy, utility and planning models. Sistemi Urbani, 3, 33-54.
  13. de la Barra, T (1989). Integrated Land Use and Transport Modelling., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
  14. Dickey,JW and Leiner,C (1983). Use of TOPAZ for transportation-land use planning in a suburban county. Transportation Research Record, 931, 20-26.
  15. Echenique, MH (1985). The use of integrated land use transportation planning models: the cases of Sao Paulo, Brazil and Bilbao, Spain. In Florian,M (Ed.). The Practice of Transportation Planning, Elsevier, Netherlands.
  16. Echenique,MH, Flowerdew,AD, Hunt,JD, Mayo,TR, Skidmore,IJ, and Simmonds,DC (1990). The MEPLAN models of Bilbao, Leeds and Dortmund. Transportation Reviews, 10, 309-322.
  17. Echenique,MH and Williams,IN (1980). Developing theoretically based urban models for practical planning studies. Sistemi Urbani, 1, 13-23.
  18. Forrester,JW (1969). Urban Dynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  19. Garin,RA (1966). A matrix formulation of the Lowry model for intra-metropolitan activity location. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 32, 361-364.
  20. Giuliano,G (1986). Land use impacts of transportation investments: highways and transit. In Hanson,S (Ed.) The Geography of Urban Transportation, 247-279. Guilford Press, NY
  21. Giuliano,G (1989). Research Policy and Review 27, New directions for understanding transportation and land use, Environment and Planning, 21A, 145-159.
  22. Goldner,W (1971). The Lowry Model Heritage. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 37, 100-110.
  23. Guensler,R (1993). Critical needs in land use, transportation and air quality. Transportation Research News, 167, 21-23.
  24. Hansen,WG (1959). How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25, 73-81.
  25. Harris,B (1994). The real issue with Lee's requiem. Journal of the American Planning Association, 60, 31-34.

  26. Herbert,JD and Stevens,BH (1960). A model for the distribution of residential activity in urban areas. Journal of Regional Science, 2, 21-36.
  27. Hunt,JD (1993). A description of the MEPLAN framework for land use and transport interaction modeling. Paper prewsented at the 73rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC
  28. Hunt,JD and Simmonds,DC (1993). Theory and application of an integrated land-use and transport modeling framework. Environment and Planning, 20B, 221-244.
  29. Hutchinson,BG and Batty,M (Eds.) (1986). Advances in Urban Systems Modelling. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
  30. Ingram,GK, Kain,JF, and Ginn,JR (1972). The Detroit Prototype of the NBER Urban Simulation Model. National Bureau of Economic Research, New York, NY.
  31. Klosterman,RE (1994). An Introduction to the Literature on Large-Scale Models, Journal of the American Planning Association, 60(1), 41-44.
  32. Kim,TJ (1989). Integrated Urban System modeling: Theory and Practice. Martinus Nijhoff, Norwell, MA
  33. Landis,JD (1994). The California urban futures model. A new generation of metropolitan simulation models. Environment and Planning, 21B, 399-422.
  34. Lee,DB (1994). Retrospective on large-scale urban models. Journal of the American Planning Association, 60, 35-40.
  35. Leontief,W (1967). Input-Output Economics. Oxford University Press, NY
  36. Los,M (1979). Combined residential-location and transportation models. Environment and Planning, 11A, 1241-1265.
  37. Lowry,IS (1964). A Model of Metropolis. RM-4035-RC. The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA
  38. Macgill,SM and Wilson,AG (1979). Equivalences and similarities between some alternative urban and regional models. Sistemi Urbani 1, 9-40.
  39. Mackett,RL (1985). Integrated land use-transport models. Transportation Reviews, 5, 325-343.
  40. Mackett,RL (1990a). The systematic application of the LILT model to Dortmund, Leeds and Tokyo. Transportation Reviews, 10, 323-338.
  41. Mackett,RL (1990b). Comparative analysis of modelling land-use transport interaction at the micro and macro levels. Environment and Planning, 22A, 459-475.
  42. Mackett,RL (1991a). A Model-based analysis of land-use and transport policies for Tokyo, Transportation Reviews, 11, 1-18.
  43. Mackett,RL (1991b). LILT and MEPLAN: A comparative analysis of land-use and transport policies for Leeds, Transportation Reviews, 11, 131-154.
  44. Mackett,RL (1993). Structure of linkages between transport and land use. Transportation Research, 27B, 189-206.
  45. Mackett,RL (1994). Land Use Transportation Models for Policy Analysis. Transportation Research Record, 1466.
  46. Martinez,FJ (1992a). Towards the 5-stage land-use transport model. In Land Use, Development and Globalisation. Proceedings Oof the Sixth World Conference on Transport Research. 79-90. Lyon, France.
  47. Martinez,FJ (1992b). The bid-choice land-use model: an integrated economic framework. Environment and Planning, 24A, 871-875.
  48. Miller,E, Kriger,D, and Hunt,JD (1998). Integrated Urban Models for Simulation of Transit and Land Use Policies: Guidelines for Implementation and Use, Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, 1999 [see: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/9435.html]
  49. Miller,HW,Jr. (1990) A theoretical framework for the interactions among models in the integrated transportation and land-use package. Environment and Planning, 22A, 1355-1373.
  50. Mills,ES (1967). An aggregative model of resource allocation in metropolitan areas. American Economic Review, 57, 197-210.

  51. Neidercorn,JA and Bechdolt,BV (1969). An economic derivation of the gravity law. Journal of Regional Science, 9, 273-282.
  52. Porter,C, Melendy,L, and Deakin,E (1995). Land Use and Travel Survey Data: A Survey of the Metropolitan Planning Organizations of the 35 Largest U.S. Metropolitan Areas. In Texas Transportation Institute (eds). Land Use Compendium, Travel Model Improvement Program, DOT-T-99-03, 169-188.
  53. Prastacos,P (1986a). An integrated land-use-transportation model for the San Francisco Region: 1. Design and mathematical structure. Environment and Planning, 18A, 307-322.
  54. Prastacos,P (1986b). An integrated land-use-transportation model for the San Francisco Region: 2. Empirical estimation and results. Environment and Planning, 18A, 511-528.
  55. Putman,SH (1975). Urban land use transportation models: a state-of-the-art summary. Transportation Research, 9, 187-202.
  56. Putman,SH (1983). Integrated Urban Models. Pion Limited, London. England.
  57. Putman,SH (1991). Integrated Urban Models 2. Pion Limited, London. England.
  58. Putman,SH (1994). Integrated land use and transportation models: an overview of progress with DRAM and EMPAL, with suggestions for further research. Paper prepared for the 73rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC
  59. Putman,SH (1995). EMPAL and DRAM Location and Land use Models: An Overview. Paper distributed at the Transportation Model Improvement Program's Land Use Modeling Conference, Dallas, Texas, February 19-21.
  60. Sharpe,R and Karlqvist,A (1980). Towards a unifying theory for modeling urban systems. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 10, 241-257.
  61. Southworth,F (1995). A Technical Review of Urban Land Use - Transportation Models as Tools for Evaluating Vehicle Travel Reduction Strategies. In Texas Transportation Institute (eds). Land Use Compendium, Travel Model Improvement Program, DOT-T-99-03, 3-112.
  62. Texas Transportation Institute (eds) (1999). Land Use Compendium. Travel Model Improvement Program, DOT-T-99-03.
  63. Watterson,WT (1990). Adapting and applying existing urban models: DRAM and EMPAL in the Seattle region. Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association, 2(2), 35-46.
  64. Watterson,WT (1993). Linked simulation of land use and transportation systems: developments and experience in the Puget Sound region. Transportation Research, 27A, 193-206.
  65. Webster,FV, Bly,PH, and Paulley,NJ (Eds.) (1988). Urban Land-Use and Transport Interaction: Policies and Models, Gower, Aldershot, U.K.
  66. Webster,FV, and Pauley,NJ (1991). Overview of an International Study to Compare Models and Evaluate Land-Use and Transport Policies." Transport Reviews, 11(3), 197-222.
  67. Wegener,M (1982). A multilevel economic-demographic model for the Dortmund region. Sistemi Urbani, 3, 371-401.
  68. Wegener,M (1994). Operational urban models: state of the art. Journal of the American Planning Association, 60(1), 17-29.
  69. Wegener,M (1995). Current and future land use models. In Shunk,GA et al. (eds.) Land Use Modeling Conference Proceedings, Transportation Model Improvement Program. DOT-T-96-09
  70. Wegener,M, Mackett,RL, and Simmonds,DC (1991). One city, three models: comparison of land-use/transport policy simulation models for Dortmund. Transportation Reviews, 11, 107-129.
  71. Weiner,E (1992). Urban Transportation Planning In The United States: An Historical Overview, On-line version, Transportation Model Improvement Program.
  72. Wheaton,WC (1974). Linear Programming and locational Equilibrium: The Herbert-Stevens Model Revisited. Journal of Urban Economics, 1, 278-287.
  73. Williams,HCWL (1977). On the formation of travel demand models and economic evaluation measures of user benefit. Environment and Planning, 9A, 285-344.
  74. Wilson,AG (1967). A statistical theory of spatial trip distribution models, Transportation Research, 1, 253-269.
  75. Wilson,AG (1970). Entropy in Urban and Regional Modelling. Pion, London. England.

  76. Wilson,AG (1970). Advance and Problems in Distribution Modeling. Transportation Research, 4, 1-18
  77. Wilson,AG (1971). A family of spatial interaction models and associated developments. Environment and Planning, 3, 1-32.
  78. Wilson,AG, Rees,PH, and Leigh,CM (1977). Models Of Cities And Regions: Theoretical and Empirical Developments, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England.
  79. Wilson,AG (1998). "Land Use/Transport Interaction Models: Past and Future." Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 32(1), 3-26.
  80. Wingo,L (1961). Transportation and Urban Land. The Johns Hopkins University Press. Baltimore, Maryland.
CEE 225A Land Use / Transportation References [ back to top ]
[ CEE 225a Home | Last modified: 22 March 2021 | terms of use | © mgm ]