published journal article
Area of Expertise: Unspecified
conference paper
Cross-domain security of cyber-physical systems
2017 22nd asia and south pacific design automation conference (ASP-DAC)
Publication Date
Author(s)
Suggested Citation
Sujit Rokka Chhetri, Jiang Wan and Mohammad Abdullah Al Faruque (2017) “Cross-domain security of cyber-physical systems”, in 2017 22nd asia and south pacific design automation conference (ASP-DAC). IEEE, pp. 200–205. Available at: 10.1109/aspdac.2017.7858320.conference paper
Fleet Sizing for Robo-taxi Services: Comparing Novel and State-of-the-Art Scalable Modeling Approaches
102nd Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting 2023
Publication Date
Author(s)
Suggested Citation
Arash Ghaffar, Negin Shariat and Michael Hyland (2023) “Fleet Sizing for Robo-taxi Services: Comparing Novel and State-of-the-Art Scalable Modeling Approaches”.conference paper
Vickery's bathtub model
Proceedings of the 3rd annual irvine symposium for emerging research in transportation (ISERT 2020)
Publication Date
Author(s)
Suggested Citation
Wenlong Jin (2020) “Vickery's bathtub model”, in Proceedings of the 3rd annual irvine symposium for emerging research in transportation (ISERT 2020).conference paper
Estimating Choice Models from Discrete Choice Experiments with Customization-Induced Endogeneity
ICMC2022: 7TH INTERNATIONAL CHOICE MODELLING CONFERENCE (ICMC)
Publication Date
Author(s)
Suggested Citation
David Bunch, Debapriya Chakraborty and David Brownstone (2022) “Estimating Choice Models from Discrete Choice Experiments with Customization-Induced Endogeneity”. Reykjavik, Iceland.published journal article
Evaluation of the Dimensions of Anger Reactions-5 (DAR-5) Scale in combat veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publication Date
Author(s)
Suggested Citation
David Forbes, Nathan Alkemade, Dale Hopcraft, Graeme Hawthorne, Paul O'Halloran, Jon D. Elhai, Tony McHugh, Glen Bates, Raymond W. Novaco, Richard Bryant and Virginia Lewis (2014) “Evaluation of the Dimensions of Anger Reactions-5 (DAR-5) Scale in combat veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder”, Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 28(8), pp. 830–835. Available at: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.09.015.published journal article
Aircraft Takeoff and Landing Weight Estimation from Surveillance Data
Journal of Air Transportation
Publication Date
Author(s)
Abstract
Aircraft weight estimation is a common problem facing researchers working with aircraft surveillance data. Although knowledge of an aircraft’s weight and thrust is required for many types of analyses, such as those evaluating aircraft acoustic noise, fuel burn, and emissions, these parameters are typically not available from surveillance sources. Instead, researchers generally only have access to basic aircraft states: lateral position, groundspeed, and altitude. Therefore, methods for estimating the weight of aircraft from these basic states become necessary in cases where aircraft performance is a key component of the analysis. This paper introduces two weight estimation models: one for the estimation of aircraft takeoff weight from departure data, and another for the estimation of aircraft landing weight from arrival data. The models are mathematically simple but grounded in knowledge of aircraft certification, airline operations, and aircraft flight management system logic. The landing weight estimation model proposed is shown to have a mean absolute error equivalent to 2.66% of maximum takeoff weight and a standard deviation of 3.35% of maximum takeoff weight when validated using onboard data recordings from 240 Airbus A320 flights. Similarly, the proposed takeoff weight estimation model is shown to have a mean absolute error of 2.83% of the maximum takeoff weight and a standard deviation of 3.55% of the maximum takeoff weight when applied to the same validation dataset.
Suggested Citation
Sandro Salgueiro, R. John Hansman and Jacqueline Huynh (2025) “Aircraft Takeoff and Landing Weight Estimation from Surveillance Data”, Journal of Air Transportation, 33(1), pp. 48–56. Available at: 10.2514/1.D0370.conference paper
Intelligent surveillance using inductive signatures
Proceedings of the fifth joint conference on information sciences, vols 1 and 2
Publication Date
Author(s)
Abstract
Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) can be a major component for improving transportation efficiency, safety, and environmental sustainability. However, many ITS strategies require accurate and appropriate data in order to function properly. The use of inductive signatures in an intelligent fashion can produce many types of data that are ideal as an input to these ITS strategies. A major benefit of using inductive loops is the wide availability of inductive loops in local and state roadways. Inductive signature analysis exploits the existing infrastructure to obtain valuable measures such as section density, section travel time, vehicle classification, single loop speed, lane change, and partial dynamic origin/destination demand. These measures are derived by using pattern recognition and optimization techniques such as multi-criteria optimization, artificial neural networks, and heuristics.
Suggested Citation
C Sun and S Ritchie (2000) “Intelligent surveillance using inductive signatures”, in . Wang, PP (ed.) Proceedings of the fifth joint conference on information sciences, vols 1 and 2. ASSOC INTELLIGENT MACHINERY, pp. 722–725.published journal article
Organization Structure and Performance: A Critical Review
Academy of Management Review
Publication Date
Suggested Citation
Dan R. Dalton, William D. Todor, Michael J. Spendolini, Gordon J. Fielding and Lyman W. Porter (1980) “Organization Structure and Performance: A Critical Review”, Academy of Management Review, 5(1), pp. 49–64. Available at: 10.5465/amr.1980.4288881.conference paper
LiDAR Spoofing Meets the New-Gen: Capability Improvements, Broken Assumptions, and New Attack Strategies
Proceedings 2024 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium
Publication Date
Author(s)
Abstract
LiDAR (Light Detection And Ranging) is an indispensable sensor for precise long- and wide-range 3D sensing, which directly benefited the recent rapid deployment of autonomous driving (AD). Meanwhile, such a safety-critical application strongly motivates its security research. A recent line of research finds that one can manipulate the LiDAR point cloud and fool object detectors by firing malicious lasers against LiDAR. However, these efforts face 3 critical research gaps: (1) considering only one specific LiDAR (VLP-16); (2) assuming unvalidated attack capabilities; and (3) evaluating object detectors with limited spoofing capability modeling and setup diversity. To fill these critical research gaps, we conduct the first large-scale measurement study on LiDAR spoofing attack capabilities on object detectors with 9 popular LiDARs, covering both first- and new-generation LiDARs, and 3 major types of object detectors trained on 5 different datasets. To facilitate the measurements, we (1) identify spoofer improvements that significantly improve the latest spoofing capability, (2) identify a new object removal attack that overcomes the applicability limitation of the latest method to new-generation LiDARs, and (3) perform novel mathematical modeling for both object injection and removal attacks based on our measurement results. Through this study, we are able to uncover a total of 15 novel findings, including not only completely new ones due to the measurement angle novelty, but also many that can directly challenge the latest understandings in this problem space. We also discuss defenses.