published journal article

Modeling network traffic for planning applications in a small community

Journal of Urban Planning and Development

Publication Date

September 1, 2006

Author(s)

Ming-Sheng Lee, Anthony Chen, Piya Chootinan, Walter Laabs, Will Recker
Suggested Citation
Ming S. Lee, Anthony Chen, Piya Chootinan, Walter Laabs and Will Recker (2006) “Modeling network traffic for planning applications in a small community”, Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 132(3), pp. 156–159. Available at: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9488(2006)132:3(156).

conference paper

Cross-domain security of cyber-physical systems

2017 22nd asia and south pacific design automation conference (ASP-DAC)

Publication Date

January 1, 2017

Author(s)

Sujit Rokka Chhetri, Jiang Wan, Mohammad Al Faruque
Suggested Citation
Sujit Rokka Chhetri, Jiang Wan and Mohammad Abdullah Al Faruque (2017) “Cross-domain security of cyber-physical systems”, in 2017 22nd asia and south pacific design automation conference (ASP-DAC). IEEE, pp. 200–205. Available at: 10.1109/aspdac.2017.7858320.

conference paper

Fleet Sizing for Robo-taxi Services: Comparing Novel and State-of-the-Art Scalable Modeling Approaches

102nd Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting 2023

Publication Date

January 1, 2023
Suggested Citation
Arash Ghaffar, Negin Shariat and Michael Hyland (2023) “Fleet Sizing for Robo-taxi Services: Comparing Novel and State-of-the-Art Scalable Modeling Approaches”.

conference paper

Vickery's bathtub model

Proceedings of the 3rd annual irvine symposium for emerging research in transportation (ISERT 2020)

Publication Date

January 1, 2020

Author(s)

Suggested Citation
Wenlong Jin (2020) “Vickery's bathtub model”, in Proceedings of the 3rd annual irvine symposium for emerging research in transportation (ISERT 2020).

conference paper

Estimating Choice Models from Discrete Choice Experiments with Customization-Induced Endogeneity

ICMC2022: 7TH INTERNATIONAL CHOICE MODELLING CONFERENCE (ICMC)

Publication Date

May 24, 2022

Author(s)

Suggested Citation
David Bunch, Debapriya Chakraborty and David Brownstone (2022) “Estimating Choice Models from Discrete Choice Experiments with Customization-Induced Endogeneity”. Reykjavik, Iceland.

published journal article

Evaluation of the Dimensions of Anger Reactions-5 (DAR-5) Scale in combat veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder

Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Publication Date

December 1, 2014

Author(s)

David Forbes, Nathan Alkemade, Dale Hopcraft, Graeme Hawthorne, Paul O'Halloran, Jon D. Elhai, Tony McHugh, Glen Bates, Raymond Novaco, Richard Bryant, Virginia Lewis
Suggested Citation
David Forbes, Nathan Alkemade, Dale Hopcraft, Graeme Hawthorne, Paul O'Halloran, Jon D. Elhai, Tony McHugh, Glen Bates, Raymond W. Novaco, Richard Bryant and Virginia Lewis (2014) “Evaluation of the Dimensions of Anger Reactions-5 (DAR-5) Scale in combat veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder”, Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 28(8), pp. 830–835. Available at: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.09.015.

published journal article

Aircraft Takeoff and Landing Weight Estimation from Surveillance Data

Journal of Air Transportation

Publication Date

January 1, 2025

Author(s)

Sandro Salgueiro, R. John Hansman, Jacqueline (Jacquie) Huynh

Abstract

Aircraft weight estimation is a common problem facing researchers working with aircraft surveillance data. Although knowledge of an aircraft’s weight and thrust is required for many types of analyses, such as those evaluating aircraft acoustic noise, fuel burn, and emissions, these parameters are typically not available from surveillance sources. Instead, researchers generally only have access to basic aircraft states: lateral position, groundspeed, and altitude. Therefore, methods for estimating the weight of aircraft from these basic states become necessary in cases where aircraft performance is a key component of the analysis. This paper introduces two weight estimation models: one for the estimation of aircraft takeoff weight from departure data, and another for the estimation of aircraft landing weight from arrival data. The models are mathematically simple but grounded in knowledge of aircraft certification, airline operations, and aircraft flight management system logic. The landing weight estimation model proposed is shown to have a mean absolute error equivalent to 2.66% of maximum takeoff weight and a standard deviation of 3.35% of maximum takeoff weight when validated using onboard data recordings from 240 Airbus A320 flights. Similarly, the proposed takeoff weight estimation model is shown to have a mean absolute error of 2.83% of the maximum takeoff weight and a standard deviation of 3.55% of the maximum takeoff weight when applied to the same validation dataset.

Suggested Citation
Sandro Salgueiro, R. John Hansman and Jacqueline Huynh (2025) “Aircraft Takeoff and Landing Weight Estimation from Surveillance Data”, Journal of Air Transportation, 33(1), pp. 48–56. Available at: 10.2514/1.D0370.

conference paper

Intelligent surveillance using inductive signatures

Proceedings of the fifth joint conference on information sciences, vols 1 and 2

Publication Date

January 1, 2000

Author(s)

Abstract

Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) can be a major component for improving transportation efficiency, safety, and environmental sustainability. However, many ITS strategies require accurate and appropriate data in order to function properly. The use of inductive signatures in an intelligent fashion can produce many types of data that are ideal as an input to these ITS strategies. A major benefit of using inductive loops is the wide availability of inductive loops in local and state roadways. Inductive signature analysis exploits the existing infrastructure to obtain valuable measures such as section density, section travel time, vehicle classification, single loop speed, lane change, and partial dynamic origin/destination demand. These measures are derived by using pattern recognition and optimization techniques such as multi-criteria optimization, artificial neural networks, and heuristics.

Suggested Citation
C Sun and S Ritchie (2000) “Intelligent surveillance using inductive signatures”, in . Wang, PP (ed.) Proceedings of the fifth joint conference on information sciences, vols 1 and 2. ASSOC INTELLIGENT MACHINERY, pp. 722–725.

published journal article

Organization Structure and Performance: A Critical Review

Academy of Management Review

Suggested Citation
Dan R. Dalton, William D. Todor, Michael J. Spendolini, Gordon J. Fielding and Lyman W. Porter (1980) “Organization Structure and Performance: A Critical Review”, Academy of Management Review, 5(1), pp. 49–64. Available at: 10.5465/amr.1980.4288881.

conference paper

LiDAR Spoofing Meets the New-Gen: Capability Improvements, Broken Assumptions, and New Attack Strategies

Proceedings 2024 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium

Publication Date

January 1, 2024

Author(s)

Takami Sato, Yuki Hayakawa, Ryo Suzuki, Yohsuke Shiiki, Kentaro Yoshioka, Qi Alfred Chen

Abstract

LiDAR (Light Detection And Ranging) is an indispensable sensor for precise long- and wide-range 3D sensing, which directly benefited the recent rapid deployment of autonomous driving (AD). Meanwhile, such a safety-critical application strongly motivates its security research. A recent line of research finds that one can manipulate the LiDAR point cloud and fool object detectors by firing malicious lasers against LiDAR. However, these efforts face 3 critical research gaps: (1) considering only one specific LiDAR (VLP-16); (2) assuming unvalidated attack capabilities; and (3) evaluating object detectors with limited spoofing capability modeling and setup diversity. To fill these critical research gaps, we conduct the first large-scale measurement study on LiDAR spoofing attack capabilities on object detectors with 9 popular LiDARs, covering both first- and new-generation LiDARs, and 3 major types of object detectors trained on 5 different datasets. To facilitate the measurements, we (1) identify spoofer improvements that significantly improve the latest spoofing capability, (2) identify a new object removal attack that overcomes the applicability limitation of the latest method to new-generation LiDARs, and (3) perform novel mathematical modeling for both object injection and removal attacks based on our measurement results. Through this study, we are able to uncover a total of 15 novel findings, including not only completely new ones due to the measurement angle novelty, but also many that can directly challenge the latest understandings in this problem space. We also discuss defenses.

Suggested Citation
Takami Sato, Yuki Hayakawa, Ryo Suzuki, Yohsuke Shiiki, Kentaro Yoshioka and Qi Alfred Chen (2024) “LiDAR Spoofing Meets the New-Gen: Capability Improvements, Broken Assumptions, and New Attack Strategies”, in Proceedings 2024 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium. Available at: 10.14722/ndss.2024.23350.