policy brief

Can Green Hydrogen Be a Cost Competitive Transportation Fuel by 2030?

Abstract

There is growing international interest in electrolytic hydrogen produced from renewable energy (often referred to as green hydrogen) as a potential zero-emission alternative to gasoline and diesel in a variety of on-road and off-road transportation applications. Currently, gasoline and diesel are priced around $4 per gallon at the pump and a gallon of either fuel is roughly the equivalent of one kilogram of hydrogen based on energy content. Although hydrogen vehicles are generally more efficient than those fueled by petroleum, transporting and dispensing hydrogen is more expensive than for conventional fuel, so hydrogen must reach a cost substantially below $4/kg, possibly as low as $2/kg, to be a cost competitive option. Is this achievable? In short, this depends on the extent to which green hydrogen markets scale up globally. Projections of future green hydrogen production costs are generally in the range of $2–$4/kg by 20301 ; however, some expect faster and deeper declines reaching as low as $1.5/kg by 20302 and even $1/kg by 2030 under ideal conditions.3 This brief examines the evidence in support of green hydrogen production achieving a cost at or below $2/kg starting from its current level of between $5 and $6/kg,4 and assesses the time point at which this cost benchmark could be achieved.

Suggested Citation
Jeff Reed (2022) Can Green Hydrogen Be a Cost Competitive Transportation Fuel by 2030?. Policy Brief. UC ITS. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7922/g2513wj8.

working paper

The Dutch Mobility Panel: Experiences and Evaluation

Publication Date

April 1, 1989

Author(s)

Leo J. G. van Wissen, Henk J. Meurs

Working Paper

UCI-ITS-WP-89-12, UCI-ITS-AS-WP-89-4

Areas of Expertise

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to give an overview of the history and research experiences of the Dutch National Mobility Panel. Attention is given to the sampling strategy, the policy goals, and the representativity of the panel. It also tries to evaluate the research outcomes in terms of the original objectives and in view of more general research and policy goals. In sections one and two, a historic overview is given, starting from the first ideas to implement a longitudinal research instrument, to transportation planning. In section three, some attention is devoted to longitudinal versus cross-sectional analyses. In section four, the sample design is treated in some detail. Next, various forms of bias are discussed that affect the representativity of the panel. In the sixth section, an overview is given of the research conducted with the data. Some conclusions are given in the final section.

Suggested Citation
Leo J.G. van Wissen and Henk J. Meurs (1989) The Dutch Mobility Panel: Experiences and Evaluation. Working Paper UCI-ITS-WP-89-12, UCI-ITS-AS-WP-89-4. Institute of Transportation Studies, Irvine. Available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0rx5c39b.

working paper

Simulating Travel Reliability

Abstract

We present a simulation model designed to determine the impact on congestion of policies for dealing with travel time uncertainty. The model combines a supply side model of congestion delay with a discrete choice econometric demand model that predicts scheduling choices for morning commute trips. The supply model describes congestion technology and exogenously specifies the probability, severity, and duration of non-recurrent events. From these, given traffic volumes, a distribution of travel times is generated, from which a mean, a standard deviation, and a probability of arriving late are calculated. The demand model uses these outputs from the supply model as independent variables and choices are forecast using sample enumeration and a synthetic sample of work start times and free flow travel times. The process is iterated until a stable congestion pattern is achieved. We report on the components of expected cost and the average travel delay for selected simulations.

research report

Review of the university of California institutes of transportation studies

Publication Date

April 1, 2018

Author(s)

University Committee on Research Policy (UCORP)
Suggested Citation
University Committee on Research Policy (UCORP) (2018) Review of the university of California institutes of transportation studies.

Phd Dissertation

Modular neural network architecture for detection of operational problems on urban arterials

Abstract

A major concern in Advanced Transportation Management Systems (ATMS), one of the principal thrusts of the national program on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), is providing decision support to effectively detect, verify and develop response strategies for incidents that disrupt the flow of traffic. A key element of providing such support is automating the process of detecting operational problems on large area networks. Successful detection of operational problems in their early stages is vital for formulating response strategies such as modifying surface street signal timing plans and activating or updating traveler information systems, including changeable message signs, in-vehicle navigation systems and highway advisory radio, altering emergency services, amongst others. Reliable surface street incident detection is also necessary for the development of integrated freeway-arterial control systems. Incident detection has been the subject of research for the past two decades. But the focus has been on detecting capacity reducing non-recurring congestion on freeways. Only recently has attention begun to focus on developing a methodology for surface street networks. The main focus of this research was to develop a methodology to detect different types of operational problems relevant to the operations of surface street networks. In this research, a modular architecture of neural network has been proposed to develop a comprehensive system to detect different types of operational problems, based on detector data from an urban traffic control system. The modularity of the classifier proposed decomposed the task of detecting different types of problems and produced an overall system of models that individually outperformed a single multi-layer feed-forward neural network model for lane-blocking incidents, special event conditions and detector malfunction, and also a statistically-based discriminant function model. The neural network-based models and the statistical models were developed and tested with simulated and field data from two test study areas in Anaheim and Los Angeles, California, USA. The higher detection rates and lower false alarm rates of the modular neural network model compared to other techniques demonstrated its potential of detecting different types of traffic operational problems on urban arterials.

Suggested Citation
Sarosh Khan (1995) Modular neural network architecture for detection of operational problems on urban arterials. PhD Dissertation. UC Irvine. Available at: https://uci.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01CDL_IRV_INST/17uq3m8/alma991035093389304701.

published journal article

Anaheim advanced traffic control system field operations test: A technical evaluation of SCOOT

Transportation Planning and Technology

Publication Date

December 1, 2005

Author(s)

Suggested Citation
James E. Moore, Stephen P. Mattingly, C. Arthur MacCarley and Michael G. McNally (2005) “Anaheim advanced traffic control system field operations test: A technical evaluation of SCOOT”, Transportation Planning and Technology, 28(6), pp. 465–482. Available at: 10.1080/03081060500515622.

conference paper

CARAT: Context-aware runtime adaptive task migration for multi core architectures

2011 design, automation & test in europe

Publication Date

March 1, 2011

Author(s)

J Jahn, Mohammad Al Faruque, J Henkel
Suggested Citation
J Jahn, M A A Faruque and J Henkel (2011) “CARAT: Context-aware runtime adaptive task migration for multi core architectures”, in 2011 design, automation & test in europe. IEEE, pp. 515–520. Available at: 10.1109/date.2011.5763093.

published journal article

Travel/activity analysis: Pattern recognition, classification and interpretation

Transportation Research Part A: General

Publication Date

July 1, 1985
Suggested Citation
Wilfred W. Recker, Michael G. McNally and Gregory S. Root (1985) “Travel/activity analysis: Pattern recognition, classification and interpretation”, Transportation Research Part A: General, 19(4), pp. 279–296. Available at: 10.1016/0191-2607(85)90064-0.

published journal article

Automated real-time vehicle classifier development based on vehicle signature

IJGCRSIS

Publication Date

January 1, 2009
Suggested Citation
Seri Park and Stephen G. Ritchie (2009) “Automated real-time vehicle classifier development based on vehicle signature”, IJGCRSIS, 1(2), p. 164. Available at: 10.1504/ijgcrsis.2009.028007.

published journal article

Safety of freeway median high occupancy vehicle lanes: A comparison of aggregate and disaggregate analyses

Accident Analysis & Prevention

Publication Date

February 1, 1990

Author(s)

Thomas Golob, Will Recker, Douglas W. Levine
Suggested Citation
Thomas F. Golob, Wilfred W. Recker and Douglas W. Levine (1990) “Safety of freeway median high occupancy vehicle lanes: A comparison of aggregate and disaggregate analyses”, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 22(1), pp. 19–34. Available at: 10.1016/0001-4575(90)90004-5.